by 2035

???? in May this year, the Australian government announced that, by 2035, the Australian people's retirement age from the current 65 to 70 years of age. Australia is known as the "lucky country", people enjoy a high welfare under favorable life, this delay retirement certainly stung "lucky national" nerve.

???? in recent years, the Australian resources export slowdown, national economy is affected. At the same time, the negative effect of high welfare also make the government a headache: many healthy people don't go to work, but to rely on grants life, to the state treasury "one disaster after another". In addition, along with the progress of medical science and technology and the improvement of people's living conditions, human life is greatly prolonged, and the Australian retirement policy formulation in the hundred years before, has obviously can not keep up with the pace of social development. At the same time, the Australian population structure is changing, is expected by the middle of this century, the proportion of people aged over 85 will be increased to 5% from the http://www.bigorange123.com/ current 1.7%.

???? when the population of pension and a length of all exceeded the design range after retirement, pension fund pool will run behind one's expenses, be unable to withstand the government "". Australian finance minister Hodge said, this year the pension expenditure has risen to $72000000000, or even more than the defense expenditure, in order to sustainable development of the pension system, delay retirement be imperative.

???? in fact, the aging problem has become a severe challenge to some developed countries. Both of Japan's "lost 20 years", or the European countries over much debt crisis, or American difficult to cross the "fiscal cliff", behind these economic difficulties, the aging of the population is one of the causes of. Therefore, many developed countries began to play the "retirement" abacus, in order to solve the problem of labor shortages and state finances. Last December, the British Chancellor of the exchequer Osborn announced, this century 30 time metaphase will put delay retirement age to 68 years old, 40 time end is extended to 69 years, the British government in the next 50 years will http://www.appleapphome.com/ save $500000000000 spending.

???? when delay retirement be resolving the economic http://www.applefish123.com/ difficulties of the "prescription", how in the policy implementation process, fairness and sustainability, will become the government must consider. Australia's delay retirement act, the most criticized is the age of "make it rigidly uniform". The scholar thinks, http://www.jugemblog.com pay the labor cost of different in different industries, such as construction workers, firefighters are more dangerous occupation and a greater degree of physical exertion, do http://www.thepaladin123.com/ not distinguish between labor types and unified extended to retire at the age of 70 is unfair. At the same time, the government should also provide the necessary medical care those who stay on the job of the elderly, to ensure that their mental and physical health, but at present the research of the medical costs and delay the retirement age between the Australian government lacks, the sustainability of the policy not worrying.

???? in addition, the long run, delay retirement jobs for the government to stimulate economic growth, continue to put forward higher requirements. When more and more old people to work, more and more.